Alternative Fees accounting for larger share of revenue at top law firms

If you’ve spent much time on my site, or talking to me in person, you know that I am not a fan of time-based billing, and am a huge proponent of value-based fees. Some of the worst offenders when it comes to time-based billing are lawyers — but the winds of change are beginning to blow in the legal profession. I recently posted a link to an article by Jim and Matt Hassett of LegalBizDev called, The Past and Future of Value-Based Fees and Alternative Fee arrangements.

In Jim Hassett’s latest post, he highlights a report on revenue from alternative fees based on a survey of some of the top law firms in the country:

The best data to date was published two weeks ago in the 2013 Client Advisory [PDF] from the Hildebrandt Institute and Citi Private Bank. It was based on a series of surveys of 176 large law firms (79 from the AmLaw 100, 47 from the second hundred, and 50 additional firms), and shows a slow but steady increase. In 2011, 16% of law firm revenue came from non-hourly AFAs. In 2012 it was 17%, and for 2013 they are predicting 19%.

While in some ways 19% may not sound like much, it is important to emphasize that this implies that the AmLaw 100 alone will perform over $13 billion worth of legal work this year on a non-hourly basis (assuming their total gross revenue stays around $70 billion). And while we may never know whether this percentage is exactly correct, there can be no doubt that it is going up.

Via LegalBizDev

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close